A work around for now could be to have it loop a great amount of times and set the pause time to a lower.Yes, that why I was suggesting to interrupt the Pause immediately like in PM.
I think almost all users who use interrupt in ZP have the purpose of ending the project at that moment.
Thanks.
Yes, that why I was suggesting to interrupt the Pause immediately like in PM.
I think almost all users who use interrupt in ZP have the purpose of ending the project at that moment.
Thanks.
Yes, but this way consumes CPU resource.A work around for now could be to have it loop a great amount of times and set the pause time to a lower.
Problem with this is that memory resource is not released.If you really have pause for 9999 sec and you want to interrupt that then you can remove template and add it back...
I don't think pausing it for 60 sec -> show an alert -> Repeat, would need that much memory. Throw in a counter and IF statement if needed.Yes, but this way consumes CPU resource.
But thanks.
I can add more about interrupting - would be good if stop in PM mean Stop also when c# is executed, like if you press stop then it break out of c# action and not try to finish it... Same as in Zennoposter, Interrupt should mean immediately stop and not after action is finished...Task was set to developers